As most mentally stable people are aware, the global warming hysteria is pure fabrication with no reproducible scientific fact to sustain it's continued attack against progress and economic stability. There are so few actual "scientist" who have jumped on board of this fiasco that it bewilders the mind how such hype can garner this much momentum.
Under sane circumstances, people usually require sufficient proof of an allegation before they succumb to to believing the scenario. But because Al Gore made a movie with fantastic slides, sound effects and special effects, he, single handed has convince the majority of Americans that this phenomenon is man made and that we (he) can save us from ourselves. The man who claims to have invented the Internet has also managed to create man made global warming. The man who discovered Love canals pollution, five years after the event, is going to lead us by our noses to the promised land. The man behind the Chinese political contribution scandal to re-elect Clinton and Gore, is doing all this for the poor uneducated people.
Now, I don't want to sound the alarm or suggest the Gore has an alternative motive for this scam, but the news has reported just how much Al Gore has made doing the Global Warming tour. It appears the our alarmist Al has made roughly one hundred twenty million dollars since he started this little show. Not bad for a part time job. This does not account for any of the monies he is making from the company he owns stock in that is pushed by none other than Al Gore. If Mr. Gore can force congress to push these environmental issues and purchasing Carbon Credits through his company, he stands to become the New Oil Barron of this generation. Gore has enough contacts and influence in congress to push his wealth issue through, and it will be the citizens that are forced to make him more wealthy than he is already.
Here is Al Gore, who owns multiple homes throughout the USA and none are "Green". He uses more natural resources than ten homes combined to run just one house. While George Bush's Texas home is GREEN. Al Gore, who is wealthier than George Bush, is just starting to convert his homes because the press found out how much he doesn't save. Then we must note that Al Gore takes Private Jets everywhere. Just one trip produces more carbon footprint than driving a super sized SUV for three years, yet this does not stop his activities. What's good for Al Gore is not good for Joe America. It's the same elitist attitude, do as I say, not as I do. I'm sure Al Gore is investing more of his $120,000,000.00 into his stock fund to erase his carbon footprint.
So who is Al Gore helping, you or himself? There is no proof that global warming is man made and more proof that it is directly related to the sun's activity. These warming and cooling trends have occurred in the past and will continue to do so until the end of time. Do you really think you can alter the suns output? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzSzItt6h-s The latest geological surveys done by NASA tell us a different story altogether, the sea has cooled by .07 degrees and the ice has gotten wider and thicker. This report just came out this week. And what did Al Gore say? Global warming is taking a vacation. http://www.globalwarmingisafarce.com/
Most true scientist and geologist will tell you that we should be expecting a cooling period, not a warming period, that's why Al Gore and company want to use the new term "Global Change". Ladies and Gentlemen, the earth will always be changing, it gets cold and hot. It never stays the same and there is nothing we can do about it. http://schnittshow.newsradio610.com/globalwarming.html
Conservation is not a bad idea, but it is not the culprit in changing the weather. This hysteria is solely for the purpose of making Al Gore super rich and nothing else. How long will the public continue to follow the pied piper? Until it's to late?
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Supreme Court and Guantanamo Bay
Today, the liberal United States Supreme Court has gone against all our laws and history to afford the detainees at Guantanamo, citizen legal rights. I cannot believe the socialist on the bench, namely: Kennedy, Breyer, Ginsburg (the ACLU lawyer), Souter and Stevens, actually gave American Rights to foreign combatants.
May I ask what happened during World War 2? Did America give citizen rights to the POW's? We didn't even afford these rights to our Japanese citizens, yet this group of anti-American judges have placed this great right upon those bent upon destroying our great country.
I find it very funny, that so many Americans have been complaining about the Guantanamo facility. The loony left has been demanding rights for the detainees. They have been quoting part of the Geneva Convention, but not all of it. The Geneva Convention states that the only "legal" combatant is those individuals in "uniform". Any person in civilian clothes is a "SPY" and can be executed without trial. No where does the Geneva Convention forbid torture to spies and civilian combatants, only to soldiers.
The al-Quida and the Taliban are both terrorist groups, neither are covered under the Geneva Convention. Why then do our loony lefties and the socialist in our Supreme Court demand on granting these murders full legal protection? Is there something more sinister behind their demands? I know the ACLU has an agenda to destroy this country, it is in their purpose statement from the founder. I know that socialism has permeated our education system and Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg worked for the ACLU and has favored every case brought before the court by the ACLU since she was made a Supreme Court Justice.
So now we have the loony left and the socialist judges worried about the Geneva Convention, but not once have I heard them condemn the actions of the terrorist. They can kill women and children, cut the heads off anyone they don't like, torture and kill our soldiers, but WE have to worry about the Geneva Convention. They play dead and then shoot to kill our soldiers, but any soldier who shoots a terrorist who is bleeding and the left expects OUR men be punished. Why do the enemy have more rights than our own men and women. Why does the Democratic party pander to the loony left and go against our soldiers? Why is there a massive pacification propaganda machine trying to prove the peacefulness of Islam and the lambasting of Christians?
This is the one example of why we cannot allow a liberal in the White House, we will end up with more Ginsburg's, Stevens, Souter's, Kennedy's and the likes of Breyer. It is a shameful day in American history and another black eye to the Supreme Court.
May I ask what happened during World War 2? Did America give citizen rights to the POW's? We didn't even afford these rights to our Japanese citizens, yet this group of anti-American judges have placed this great right upon those bent upon destroying our great country.
I find it very funny, that so many Americans have been complaining about the Guantanamo facility. The loony left has been demanding rights for the detainees. They have been quoting part of the Geneva Convention, but not all of it. The Geneva Convention states that the only "legal" combatant is those individuals in "uniform". Any person in civilian clothes is a "SPY" and can be executed without trial. No where does the Geneva Convention forbid torture to spies and civilian combatants, only to soldiers.
The al-Quida and the Taliban are both terrorist groups, neither are covered under the Geneva Convention. Why then do our loony lefties and the socialist in our Supreme Court demand on granting these murders full legal protection? Is there something more sinister behind their demands? I know the ACLU has an agenda to destroy this country, it is in their purpose statement from the founder. I know that socialism has permeated our education system and Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg worked for the ACLU and has favored every case brought before the court by the ACLU since she was made a Supreme Court Justice.
So now we have the loony left and the socialist judges worried about the Geneva Convention, but not once have I heard them condemn the actions of the terrorist. They can kill women and children, cut the heads off anyone they don't like, torture and kill our soldiers, but WE have to worry about the Geneva Convention. They play dead and then shoot to kill our soldiers, but any soldier who shoots a terrorist who is bleeding and the left expects OUR men be punished. Why do the enemy have more rights than our own men and women. Why does the Democratic party pander to the loony left and go against our soldiers? Why is there a massive pacification propaganda machine trying to prove the peacefulness of Islam and the lambasting of Christians?
This is the one example of why we cannot allow a liberal in the White House, we will end up with more Ginsburg's, Stevens, Souter's, Kennedy's and the likes of Breyer. It is a shameful day in American history and another black eye to the Supreme Court.
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Obama beats Hillary
Well it looks like Obama has finally won the race for the Democratic nomination for the candidacy of the Presidency of the Untied States of America. It has been a long and gifted campaign against Hillary Clinton. Gifted? Yes, Obama was chosen by the media almost from the start of his campaign, imagine being able to proclaim you (the media) elected the first black president. Everyone has been afraid to attack the man on issues that are of grave concern for fear of being called racist. It's funny, how in America, we have to worry about our speech for fear of the left labeling us with some derogatory name.
Senator Obama has been handed the campaign over that of Hillary Clinton. He has "never" been challenged for his inactivity, associations or his lunatic ideas of rebuilding America into a new and aspiring socialist nation. The media and the brainwashed youth are following someone who's only message is "change". They have not listened to what he is proposing, they are only listening to the talking points, not the substance.
Here is a man who was brought up in political world through the Chicago machine. This political machine has been one of the most vile and criminal political systems in America for years. Mr. Obama was educated and nurtured and supported by this same political mafia, he was constant friends with some of the most anti'-American individuals you can find. I know, that most people want his church association forgotten, you know, it's not his fault what his minister says. But the story goes much further, it is much more ominous than just a activist minister. Mr. Obama has said the Minister Wright was his friend and that he could not separate himself from Mr. Wright anymore than he could divorce himself from being black. If Obama is so intertwined with his anti-American, ant-white minister, what does that say about his feelings toward America and it's non-black citizens?
Yet the press has not really exposed this issues, or examined the potential conflicts of interest. Just recently he left the church for political reasons only, not for what that church stands for, but he wants to be president and the church is still too controversial for his aspirations. He has close ties to anti-American terrorist, who spent the 70's killing police and Innocent people here in America. Who openly spout their attacks and are upset they did not do more harm. What does this say about this candidate? Why doesn't the press elaborate on these issues?
The press elected Obama for their own perverse reasons and literally stopped Hillary in her footsteps. Hillary Clinton, who has been touted as the first female president, by the press and her followers, was suddenly outed by the same press that only a year earlier praised her every move. It is a shame why our free press cannot be non-partisan and just report the facts rather than spend their time convincing and brainwashing their readers and listeners. Our system would work so much nicer and effective if the press would treat EVERYONE equal. For the first time Hillary has been the target of negative press, something the Republican party is all to accustomed to.
Now the true battle begins, the battle of ideas and strengths. I only fear that this will not be the case. I am afraid that it will be a racial election, and a racial election only. This destroys the concept of choosing the best person for the position, but embeds the concept of color wins, affirmative action gone to the extreme. It's your choice, a snake oil salesman or a proven commodity.
Senator Obama has been handed the campaign over that of Hillary Clinton. He has "never" been challenged for his inactivity, associations or his lunatic ideas of rebuilding America into a new and aspiring socialist nation. The media and the brainwashed youth are following someone who's only message is "change". They have not listened to what he is proposing, they are only listening to the talking points, not the substance.
Here is a man who was brought up in political world through the Chicago machine. This political machine has been one of the most vile and criminal political systems in America for years. Mr. Obama was educated and nurtured and supported by this same political mafia, he was constant friends with some of the most anti'-American individuals you can find. I know, that most people want his church association forgotten, you know, it's not his fault what his minister says. But the story goes much further, it is much more ominous than just a activist minister. Mr. Obama has said the Minister Wright was his friend and that he could not separate himself from Mr. Wright anymore than he could divorce himself from being black. If Obama is so intertwined with his anti-American, ant-white minister, what does that say about his feelings toward America and it's non-black citizens?
Yet the press has not really exposed this issues, or examined the potential conflicts of interest. Just recently he left the church for political reasons only, not for what that church stands for, but he wants to be president and the church is still too controversial for his aspirations. He has close ties to anti-American terrorist, who spent the 70's killing police and Innocent people here in America. Who openly spout their attacks and are upset they did not do more harm. What does this say about this candidate? Why doesn't the press elaborate on these issues?
The press elected Obama for their own perverse reasons and literally stopped Hillary in her footsteps. Hillary Clinton, who has been touted as the first female president, by the press and her followers, was suddenly outed by the same press that only a year earlier praised her every move. It is a shame why our free press cannot be non-partisan and just report the facts rather than spend their time convincing and brainwashing their readers and listeners. Our system would work so much nicer and effective if the press would treat EVERYONE equal. For the first time Hillary has been the target of negative press, something the Republican party is all to accustomed to.
Now the true battle begins, the battle of ideas and strengths. I only fear that this will not be the case. I am afraid that it will be a racial election, and a racial election only. This destroys the concept of choosing the best person for the position, but embeds the concept of color wins, affirmative action gone to the extreme. It's your choice, a snake oil salesman or a proven commodity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
