Recently I have been reading about the abuses and complaints of the infamous Teachers Union and their members. I never realized just how corrupt and self centered this group of individuals apparently are. If they belong to the union and support the union's views, then I guess I can safely assume they are in bed with this self-centered political force.
Oh, yes, they are a political force. The Democratic Party has nurtured and pampered this group of citizens and the union and it's members reward the party with their blind faith. As long as the Democratic Party continues to honor, praise, reward and protect the Teachers Union, the teachers will support the Democrats no matter who or what policies they run under. This is a sizable voting block that must be protected at all cost ... your cost.
Lets examine how mistreated and unfortunate our teachers are. In 1999 the average of $43,100.00 a year. Now keep in mind, this is for a total of one hundred and eighty days of work. A teachers salary is higher than our police (who happen to protect us), firemen (who also happen to protect us) About the only people that make more than teachers are doctors, lawyers, engineers and politicians. Of that group, the only people who may work less than teachers would be the politician. And that is obvious when you watch congress on the television, they are never present. According to a survey compiled by Vedder: "Teachers earned more per hour than architects, civil engineers, mechanical engineers, statisticians, biological and life scientists, atmospheric and space scientists, registered nurses, physical therapists, university-level foreign-language teachers, librarians, technical writers, musicians, artists, and editors and reporters."
But the perks don't stop here. Teachers are the only profession that has "special" recognition days. The Federal Government has a recognize the teacher day, the states and some cities have a recognition day and a number of private industries chimed in. With each award, money and gifts are given for a teacher do to their job, teach. When was the last time the federal government acknowledged for doing your job? When is the last time you saw "Fireman of the Year Award"? "Plumber of the Year Award." "Housewife of the Year Award." Yet, teachers are given every recognition possible and afforded gifts of money, vacations and discounts. How would you like to go the Busch Gardens for free? Before I leave compensation matters I would like to bring up their real benefits, like free health care for life and a very good retirement system, which actually punishes you if you delay your retirement. Where else can you get a job with such great potential.
You, my fellow American, are paying these teachers to do nothing but slander America and demean God and country. When teachers can, without mandate, yell to the students that "Bush is like Hitler!" something is dreadfully wrong in our educational system. Recently I heard about a teacher that forced the students in his class to bow down and worship Allah, so they may have an understanding of Islam. When a school in Pennsylvania had the children chant "celebrate Kwanzaa" but refused any acknowledgement of Christmas carols, we have a problem.
Our teachers have embraced the mantra of socialism and the ideal of Marxist principles and are spreading the news to our children. That is why the Democratic Party MUST maintain control of the public schools. According to John Dewey, the founder of public education in America, said, "You can't make Socialists out of individualists-children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which is coming, where everyone is interdependent." Even the socialist founder Lenin proclaimed "Give me your four-year-olds, and in a generation I will build a Socialist state." Hitler even stated, "Let me control the textbooks and I will control the state." Why do the Democrats want to make sure they control the schools?
What about the great job teachers are doing? Lets see. Using the International comparisons, our fourth graders score he 92% in science, 70% in reading, 58% in math. Beating countries such as Germany, France and Italy. By the time these students get to 12th grade, the scores are dreadfully different. Science scores alone plummeted us to the 29% range. We went from 92 to 29 in only a matter of a few years in our public schools. Too many children are graduating from high school who cannot read or write. They cannot pass a simple literacy test and get a reasonable job. In 2003, the New York State courts officially found that graduates of the New Your City's public schools are not competent to sit on a jury.
Some funnier stats come from teacher applicants. In Massachusetts in 1998, fifty-nine percent of the candidates for teaching positions failed a basic skills test geared for eighth graders. In response, the commission suggested the passing score be lowered from 77 percent to 66 percent. There was a teacher in New York City who could not pass his exam and he hired a homeless man on the street to take the test for him.
These are just a few examples of the injustice the Teachers Union places on the taxpayer. This is the same union that is fighting to stop home schooling, they are making the "real" teachers look bad. Socialism, Fascist and Islam all rely upon one thing, ignorant subjects. That is what our schools are producing each and every day, and we reward our teachers for their vigor in destroying our great country. It our fault that America will fall, because we do NOT take a stand and force our schools to teach and not brainwash. If our teachers cannot teach they should be fired and retired citizens with practical experience should be hired, they would do a much better job than submitting our kids to brainwashed teachers in a government supported school system.
Monday, July 7, 2008
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Al Gore and the Global Warming Scam
As most mentally stable people are aware, the global warming hysteria is pure fabrication with no reproducible scientific fact to sustain it's continued attack against progress and economic stability. There are so few actual "scientist" who have jumped on board of this fiasco that it bewilders the mind how such hype can garner this much momentum.
Under sane circumstances, people usually require sufficient proof of an allegation before they succumb to to believing the scenario. But because Al Gore made a movie with fantastic slides, sound effects and special effects, he, single handed has convince the majority of Americans that this phenomenon is man made and that we (he) can save us from ourselves. The man who claims to have invented the Internet has also managed to create man made global warming. The man who discovered Love canals pollution, five years after the event, is going to lead us by our noses to the promised land. The man behind the Chinese political contribution scandal to re-elect Clinton and Gore, is doing all this for the poor uneducated people.
Now, I don't want to sound the alarm or suggest the Gore has an alternative motive for this scam, but the news has reported just how much Al Gore has made doing the Global Warming tour. It appears the our alarmist Al has made roughly one hundred twenty million dollars since he started this little show. Not bad for a part time job. This does not account for any of the monies he is making from the company he owns stock in that is pushed by none other than Al Gore. If Mr. Gore can force congress to push these environmental issues and purchasing Carbon Credits through his company, he stands to become the New Oil Barron of this generation. Gore has enough contacts and influence in congress to push his wealth issue through, and it will be the citizens that are forced to make him more wealthy than he is already.
Here is Al Gore, who owns multiple homes throughout the USA and none are "Green". He uses more natural resources than ten homes combined to run just one house. While George Bush's Texas home is GREEN. Al Gore, who is wealthier than George Bush, is just starting to convert his homes because the press found out how much he doesn't save. Then we must note that Al Gore takes Private Jets everywhere. Just one trip produces more carbon footprint than driving a super sized SUV for three years, yet this does not stop his activities. What's good for Al Gore is not good for Joe America. It's the same elitist attitude, do as I say, not as I do. I'm sure Al Gore is investing more of his $120,000,000.00 into his stock fund to erase his carbon footprint.
So who is Al Gore helping, you or himself? There is no proof that global warming is man made and more proof that it is directly related to the sun's activity. These warming and cooling trends have occurred in the past and will continue to do so until the end of time. Do you really think you can alter the suns output? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzSzItt6h-s The latest geological surveys done by NASA tell us a different story altogether, the sea has cooled by .07 degrees and the ice has gotten wider and thicker. This report just came out this week. And what did Al Gore say? Global warming is taking a vacation. http://www.globalwarmingisafarce.com/
Most true scientist and geologist will tell you that we should be expecting a cooling period, not a warming period, that's why Al Gore and company want to use the new term "Global Change". Ladies and Gentlemen, the earth will always be changing, it gets cold and hot. It never stays the same and there is nothing we can do about it. http://schnittshow.newsradio610.com/globalwarming.html
Conservation is not a bad idea, but it is not the culprit in changing the weather. This hysteria is solely for the purpose of making Al Gore super rich and nothing else. How long will the public continue to follow the pied piper? Until it's to late?
Under sane circumstances, people usually require sufficient proof of an allegation before they succumb to to believing the scenario. But because Al Gore made a movie with fantastic slides, sound effects and special effects, he, single handed has convince the majority of Americans that this phenomenon is man made and that we (he) can save us from ourselves. The man who claims to have invented the Internet has also managed to create man made global warming. The man who discovered Love canals pollution, five years after the event, is going to lead us by our noses to the promised land. The man behind the Chinese political contribution scandal to re-elect Clinton and Gore, is doing all this for the poor uneducated people.
Now, I don't want to sound the alarm or suggest the Gore has an alternative motive for this scam, but the news has reported just how much Al Gore has made doing the Global Warming tour. It appears the our alarmist Al has made roughly one hundred twenty million dollars since he started this little show. Not bad for a part time job. This does not account for any of the monies he is making from the company he owns stock in that is pushed by none other than Al Gore. If Mr. Gore can force congress to push these environmental issues and purchasing Carbon Credits through his company, he stands to become the New Oil Barron of this generation. Gore has enough contacts and influence in congress to push his wealth issue through, and it will be the citizens that are forced to make him more wealthy than he is already.
Here is Al Gore, who owns multiple homes throughout the USA and none are "Green". He uses more natural resources than ten homes combined to run just one house. While George Bush's Texas home is GREEN. Al Gore, who is wealthier than George Bush, is just starting to convert his homes because the press found out how much he doesn't save. Then we must note that Al Gore takes Private Jets everywhere. Just one trip produces more carbon footprint than driving a super sized SUV for three years, yet this does not stop his activities. What's good for Al Gore is not good for Joe America. It's the same elitist attitude, do as I say, not as I do. I'm sure Al Gore is investing more of his $120,000,000.00 into his stock fund to erase his carbon footprint.
So who is Al Gore helping, you or himself? There is no proof that global warming is man made and more proof that it is directly related to the sun's activity. These warming and cooling trends have occurred in the past and will continue to do so until the end of time. Do you really think you can alter the suns output? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzSzItt6h-s The latest geological surveys done by NASA tell us a different story altogether, the sea has cooled by .07 degrees and the ice has gotten wider and thicker. This report just came out this week. And what did Al Gore say? Global warming is taking a vacation. http://www.globalwarmingisafarce.com/
Most true scientist and geologist will tell you that we should be expecting a cooling period, not a warming period, that's why Al Gore and company want to use the new term "Global Change". Ladies and Gentlemen, the earth will always be changing, it gets cold and hot. It never stays the same and there is nothing we can do about it. http://schnittshow.newsradio610.com/globalwarming.html
Conservation is not a bad idea, but it is not the culprit in changing the weather. This hysteria is solely for the purpose of making Al Gore super rich and nothing else. How long will the public continue to follow the pied piper? Until it's to late?
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Supreme Court and Guantanamo Bay
Today, the liberal United States Supreme Court has gone against all our laws and history to afford the detainees at Guantanamo, citizen legal rights. I cannot believe the socialist on the bench, namely: Kennedy, Breyer, Ginsburg (the ACLU lawyer), Souter and Stevens, actually gave American Rights to foreign combatants.
May I ask what happened during World War 2? Did America give citizen rights to the POW's? We didn't even afford these rights to our Japanese citizens, yet this group of anti-American judges have placed this great right upon those bent upon destroying our great country.
I find it very funny, that so many Americans have been complaining about the Guantanamo facility. The loony left has been demanding rights for the detainees. They have been quoting part of the Geneva Convention, but not all of it. The Geneva Convention states that the only "legal" combatant is those individuals in "uniform". Any person in civilian clothes is a "SPY" and can be executed without trial. No where does the Geneva Convention forbid torture to spies and civilian combatants, only to soldiers.
The al-Quida and the Taliban are both terrorist groups, neither are covered under the Geneva Convention. Why then do our loony lefties and the socialist in our Supreme Court demand on granting these murders full legal protection? Is there something more sinister behind their demands? I know the ACLU has an agenda to destroy this country, it is in their purpose statement from the founder. I know that socialism has permeated our education system and Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg worked for the ACLU and has favored every case brought before the court by the ACLU since she was made a Supreme Court Justice.
So now we have the loony left and the socialist judges worried about the Geneva Convention, but not once have I heard them condemn the actions of the terrorist. They can kill women and children, cut the heads off anyone they don't like, torture and kill our soldiers, but WE have to worry about the Geneva Convention. They play dead and then shoot to kill our soldiers, but any soldier who shoots a terrorist who is bleeding and the left expects OUR men be punished. Why do the enemy have more rights than our own men and women. Why does the Democratic party pander to the loony left and go against our soldiers? Why is there a massive pacification propaganda machine trying to prove the peacefulness of Islam and the lambasting of Christians?
This is the one example of why we cannot allow a liberal in the White House, we will end up with more Ginsburg's, Stevens, Souter's, Kennedy's and the likes of Breyer. It is a shameful day in American history and another black eye to the Supreme Court.
May I ask what happened during World War 2? Did America give citizen rights to the POW's? We didn't even afford these rights to our Japanese citizens, yet this group of anti-American judges have placed this great right upon those bent upon destroying our great country.
I find it very funny, that so many Americans have been complaining about the Guantanamo facility. The loony left has been demanding rights for the detainees. They have been quoting part of the Geneva Convention, but not all of it. The Geneva Convention states that the only "legal" combatant is those individuals in "uniform". Any person in civilian clothes is a "SPY" and can be executed without trial. No where does the Geneva Convention forbid torture to spies and civilian combatants, only to soldiers.
The al-Quida and the Taliban are both terrorist groups, neither are covered under the Geneva Convention. Why then do our loony lefties and the socialist in our Supreme Court demand on granting these murders full legal protection? Is there something more sinister behind their demands? I know the ACLU has an agenda to destroy this country, it is in their purpose statement from the founder. I know that socialism has permeated our education system and Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg worked for the ACLU and has favored every case brought before the court by the ACLU since she was made a Supreme Court Justice.
So now we have the loony left and the socialist judges worried about the Geneva Convention, but not once have I heard them condemn the actions of the terrorist. They can kill women and children, cut the heads off anyone they don't like, torture and kill our soldiers, but WE have to worry about the Geneva Convention. They play dead and then shoot to kill our soldiers, but any soldier who shoots a terrorist who is bleeding and the left expects OUR men be punished. Why do the enemy have more rights than our own men and women. Why does the Democratic party pander to the loony left and go against our soldiers? Why is there a massive pacification propaganda machine trying to prove the peacefulness of Islam and the lambasting of Christians?
This is the one example of why we cannot allow a liberal in the White House, we will end up with more Ginsburg's, Stevens, Souter's, Kennedy's and the likes of Breyer. It is a shameful day in American history and another black eye to the Supreme Court.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)