Well it looks like Obama has finally won the race for the Democratic nomination for the candidacy of the Presidency of the Untied States of America. It has been a long and gifted campaign against Hillary Clinton. Gifted? Yes, Obama was chosen by the media almost from the start of his campaign, imagine being able to proclaim you (the media) elected the first black president. Everyone has been afraid to attack the man on issues that are of grave concern for fear of being called racist. It's funny, how in America, we have to worry about our speech for fear of the left labeling us with some derogatory name.
Senator Obama has been handed the campaign over that of Hillary Clinton. He has "never" been challenged for his inactivity, associations or his lunatic ideas of rebuilding America into a new and aspiring socialist nation. The media and the brainwashed youth are following someone who's only message is "change". They have not listened to what he is proposing, they are only listening to the talking points, not the substance.
Here is a man who was brought up in political world through the Chicago machine. This political machine has been one of the most vile and criminal political systems in America for years. Mr. Obama was educated and nurtured and supported by this same political mafia, he was constant friends with some of the most anti'-American individuals you can find. I know, that most people want his church association forgotten, you know, it's not his fault what his minister says. But the story goes much further, it is much more ominous than just a activist minister. Mr. Obama has said the Minister Wright was his friend and that he could not separate himself from Mr. Wright anymore than he could divorce himself from being black. If Obama is so intertwined with his anti-American, ant-white minister, what does that say about his feelings toward America and it's non-black citizens?
Yet the press has not really exposed this issues, or examined the potential conflicts of interest. Just recently he left the church for political reasons only, not for what that church stands for, but he wants to be president and the church is still too controversial for his aspirations. He has close ties to anti-American terrorist, who spent the 70's killing police and Innocent people here in America. Who openly spout their attacks and are upset they did not do more harm. What does this say about this candidate? Why doesn't the press elaborate on these issues?
The press elected Obama for their own perverse reasons and literally stopped Hillary in her footsteps. Hillary Clinton, who has been touted as the first female president, by the press and her followers, was suddenly outed by the same press that only a year earlier praised her every move. It is a shame why our free press cannot be non-partisan and just report the facts rather than spend their time convincing and brainwashing their readers and listeners. Our system would work so much nicer and effective if the press would treat EVERYONE equal. For the first time Hillary has been the target of negative press, something the Republican party is all to accustomed to.
Now the true battle begins, the battle of ideas and strengths. I only fear that this will not be the case. I am afraid that it will be a racial election, and a racial election only. This destroys the concept of choosing the best person for the position, but embeds the concept of color wins, affirmative action gone to the extreme. It's your choice, a snake oil salesman or a proven commodity.
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Saturday, May 31, 2008
Second Amenment Rights
America and the Second Amendment, is it still valid? Oh, I know, there are thousands of people who are screaming that the right to own firearms does not belong to the people, but only to the state militia. I hear a lot of liberals/fascist/socialist/communist insist that if it were not for guns we would not have crime. No one would ever be shot. All those children who accidentally shoot themselves or their friends would be alive if it weren't for those evil guns. The funny thing is, every state and city with the harshest laws against the honest citizen, the most restrictive laws, are also the area's where crime runs ramped.
The questions about the terminology of the Second Amendment has been discusses and talked about over the years. Yet all it takes is for someone to read the intention of the founders to know the answer to these questions. Is the right of ownership reserved for the militia alone or for the people as a whole?
John Madison, our fourth President and author of our Constitution and Bill of Rights has this to say:
"The Constitution preserves "the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation... (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (The Federalist, No. 46)
Wow, what does this one statement tell us? That every nation that fears it's people is a nation that is against it's people. Look at Adolf Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Pol-Pot and every other communist and dictator nation on this earth. What was the first thing the government did? Take away the firearms from the people! Why? Because the people will now be subservient to anything the government want to do, any dictate or law can be processed without fear of retaliation from the people. Ask all those millions of Vietnamese that we ran out on, what it meant to be unarmed and unprotected. Ask the Jews what it was like when Germany took away their guns.
We are already at a disadvantage because of the 1968 gun laws, which ironically were taken almost verbatim from Hitlers gun laws. Congress and the socialists have done their best to convince America that the firearms are for "sport shooting and hunting". These statements are far from the truth. Our Second Amendment was designed to follow through with our countries Declaration of Independence. If our government fails to be for the people and by the people, if it decide to take away your rights as stated in the Constitution (not the make believe rights of the liberals), if our government becomes inattentive to the voice of it's citizens, the citizen has the absolute right to reclaim their country. That is what the South did during the War Between the States (1861-65). In an effort to extract themselves from a tyrannical government, as they perceived it, they took up arms, the most advanced arms that they had. During our Revolution we used the most advance firearms of the times, the Brown Bess. Yet our government, in fear of the people has made it illegal to own military grade firearms, a direct violation of the Second Amendment.
I wonder what James Madison would say about our predicament today? Would he favor our laws or have other speeches of wisdom?
The questions about the terminology of the Second Amendment has been discusses and talked about over the years. Yet all it takes is for someone to read the intention of the founders to know the answer to these questions. Is the right of ownership reserved for the militia alone or for the people as a whole?
John Madison, our fourth President and author of our Constitution and Bill of Rights has this to say:
"The Constitution preserves "the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation... (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (The Federalist, No. 46)
Wow, what does this one statement tell us? That every nation that fears it's people is a nation that is against it's people. Look at Adolf Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Pol-Pot and every other communist and dictator nation on this earth. What was the first thing the government did? Take away the firearms from the people! Why? Because the people will now be subservient to anything the government want to do, any dictate or law can be processed without fear of retaliation from the people. Ask all those millions of Vietnamese that we ran out on, what it meant to be unarmed and unprotected. Ask the Jews what it was like when Germany took away their guns.
We are already at a disadvantage because of the 1968 gun laws, which ironically were taken almost verbatim from Hitlers gun laws. Congress and the socialists have done their best to convince America that the firearms are for "sport shooting and hunting". These statements are far from the truth. Our Second Amendment was designed to follow through with our countries Declaration of Independence. If our government fails to be for the people and by the people, if it decide to take away your rights as stated in the Constitution (not the make believe rights of the liberals), if our government becomes inattentive to the voice of it's citizens, the citizen has the absolute right to reclaim their country. That is what the South did during the War Between the States (1861-65). In an effort to extract themselves from a tyrannical government, as they perceived it, they took up arms, the most advanced arms that they had. During our Revolution we used the most advance firearms of the times, the Brown Bess. Yet our government, in fear of the people has made it illegal to own military grade firearms, a direct violation of the Second Amendment.
I wonder what James Madison would say about our predicament today? Would he favor our laws or have other speeches of wisdom?
Friday, May 30, 2008
Obama's Economics
Obamanomics, the new word for economic disaster. If we thought John McCain was left behind in the economic education department, wait till you take notice and read all about Obama's proposals for America. If you have read my post titled "show me the money" this will just be more detailed information on policies.
According to Larry Kudlow of CNBC, "Obama's spend-o-meter is now up around $800 billion." Try that again .. $800 billion. And by taxing only the rich will not fill the coffers enough to fulfill all of his pledges and promises. He is going to have to attack the middle class to meet his financial responsibilities.
Lets start with his proposal to increase the minimum wage to $9.50 an hour and would like to see minimum wage attached to inflation. As inflation increases so does minimum wage. Now this doesn't look bad, does it? Lets consider the true impact of such an act. It will promote to hiring of more illegal aliens, they are off the books and work for slave wages (America's new slave trade). More of our youth will not have the opportunity to earn money because no one is going to hire extra help at these prices. Lets take this a step further, your Big Mac is going to cost you a few extra dollars to support the high wages paid for unskilled workers. For your information, minimum wage was invented to provide a minimum income for a "trainee", unskilled, untaught individual. This level of income was NOT intended for you to remain there, just to learn and move on. Each time these wages have been increased, fewer of our young men and women are able to find jobs because fewer small business are hiring more people.
Although 52% of American citizens own stocks, Senator Obama wants to raise the Capital Gains tax to 30%, doubling the current 15% tax. What does this mean to our economy you may ask. It will lower the investments made by corporations, individuals and investors. These investors will most likely seek investments in foreign markets, and keep from paying taxes on the gains until they sell them. They don't have to sell them until our tax policies are realistic so the outcome will be a lowering of American investments. This will cause a downturn in our economy and provide us with excessive unemployment.
Why would Senator Obama do such damaging maneuver? Simple, Mr. Obama maintains very few stocks. Obama has never been an investor and as such does not understand the principles. All he is looking at is the fact that CEO's and managers are reaping huge sums of money from stocks and thinks that they are the ones taking money from the people. In order to punish the stock brokers for earning money, he is willing to punish the entire economy and all of the small investors. This is pure ignorance of economic matters at work.
Under Obamanomics, the United States will become the highest taxed nation in the world. While most nations are lowering their tax rates, he will be raising ours. More than twenty countries have adopted the "flat tax" principles that have been touted by such pundits as President Ronald Regan, Steve Forbes and countless others. Our foreign neighbors will have a booming economy while America will lag behind and possibly go into an extended recession. Obama's economics will such the lifeblood out of our economy and our nation.
Stay tuned for more information about Obamanomics.
According to Larry Kudlow of CNBC, "Obama's spend-o-meter is now up around $800 billion." Try that again .. $800 billion. And by taxing only the rich will not fill the coffers enough to fulfill all of his pledges and promises. He is going to have to attack the middle class to meet his financial responsibilities.
Lets start with his proposal to increase the minimum wage to $9.50 an hour and would like to see minimum wage attached to inflation. As inflation increases so does minimum wage. Now this doesn't look bad, does it? Lets consider the true impact of such an act. It will promote to hiring of more illegal aliens, they are off the books and work for slave wages (America's new slave trade). More of our youth will not have the opportunity to earn money because no one is going to hire extra help at these prices. Lets take this a step further, your Big Mac is going to cost you a few extra dollars to support the high wages paid for unskilled workers. For your information, minimum wage was invented to provide a minimum income for a "trainee", unskilled, untaught individual. This level of income was NOT intended for you to remain there, just to learn and move on. Each time these wages have been increased, fewer of our young men and women are able to find jobs because fewer small business are hiring more people.
Although 52% of American citizens own stocks, Senator Obama wants to raise the Capital Gains tax to 30%, doubling the current 15% tax. What does this mean to our economy you may ask. It will lower the investments made by corporations, individuals and investors. These investors will most likely seek investments in foreign markets, and keep from paying taxes on the gains until they sell them. They don't have to sell them until our tax policies are realistic so the outcome will be a lowering of American investments. This will cause a downturn in our economy and provide us with excessive unemployment.
Why would Senator Obama do such damaging maneuver? Simple, Mr. Obama maintains very few stocks. Obama has never been an investor and as such does not understand the principles. All he is looking at is the fact that CEO's and managers are reaping huge sums of money from stocks and thinks that they are the ones taking money from the people. In order to punish the stock brokers for earning money, he is willing to punish the entire economy and all of the small investors. This is pure ignorance of economic matters at work.
Under Obamanomics, the United States will become the highest taxed nation in the world. While most nations are lowering their tax rates, he will be raising ours. More than twenty countries have adopted the "flat tax" principles that have been touted by such pundits as President Ronald Regan, Steve Forbes and countless others. Our foreign neighbors will have a booming economy while America will lag behind and possibly go into an extended recession. Obama's economics will such the lifeblood out of our economy and our nation.
Stay tuned for more information about Obamanomics.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
