Show me the Money!
That's part of what this presidential election is going to come down to. Who is going to take your money our of your wallet. Unless you like some of our super rich citizens, who are more than willing to hand up your hard earned cash for the good of the whole, you may be interested in these figures.
Capital Gains Tax:
McCain 15% (no change)
Obama 28%
Clinton 24%
Dividend Tax:
McCain 15% (no change)
Obama 39.6%
Clinton 39.6%
Income Tax:
McCain (no changes)
Single 30K = $4,500 tax
Single 50K = $12,500
Single 75K =$18,750
Married 60K =$9,000
Married 75K =$18,750
Married 125K =$31,250
Obama and Clinton (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)
Single 30K =$8,400 Tax
Single 50K =$14,000
Single 75K =$23,250
Married 60K =$16,800
Married 75K =$21,000
Married 125K =$38,750
Inheritance Tax:
McCain 0% (no change, Bush repealed the tax)
Obama Return to inheritance tax
Clinton Return to inheritance tax
Some of the new taxes proposed by both Hillary Clinton and Obama:
Additional gas taxes, new taxes for dwellings over 2400 square feet, new taxes to pay for the multi-billion dollar health care program, taxes on natural resources (gas, water, electricity, etc)
Overall, after analyzing Obama's promised planes and new taxes, which include: Health care ($65 Billion per year); energy plan ($15 Billion a year); national infrastructure re-investment bank ($6 Billion a year); assistance to the poor ; "fairness for middle class"; Economic stimulus package ($75 Billion); education (18 Billion a year); national service plan (&14 Billion a year); foreign assistance funding (increase by $25 Billion per year); "Obama for America" tax of 1/7th of 1% tax to give to poor countries ($845Billion per year), and the list goes on and on. Check it out: http://www.barackobama.com/
All and all, Barack Obama will cost Americans about $874.35 Billion dollars in added programs for one term in the White House. Not bad for a beginner. Hillary Clinton's package is almost the same but with different programs. Now like I said, if Soros, Bloomberg and Hollywood want to pay for this bill, welcome to it, they have more than enough cash to support their socialist dream. I do not believe that the American people can afford such spending. We need government to STOP spending and decrease their appetite. I sort of liked my tax break from President Bush and I'm far from the cream of the crop. I'm not "Rich" but that tax break helped my family, now the with the likes of Obama and Clinton, they want to take those meager funds away so they can re-distribute them to others, even other countries or the United Nations.
Even if you have no concept of foreign relations, economics, judicial matters or military matters, you have to have some knowledge of finances, or your one of those that bought your home without sufficient funds and are now loosing it. This socialist program does NOT belong in America and we cannot afford, financially or historically, to embrace the demise of the American culture and convert it to a socialist government, where every one has a chicken for the pot but you don't have a pot for the chicken.
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Monday, May 19, 2008
Climate change will cost you money
Climate Warming or is it Change now? The snake oil salesmen of our country and government have managed to sell Climate Change as a disease, something we can cure because we did it in the first place. The same crowd that always blam's America for every ill this world has. Not to get too far off track, these are the same scientist that proclaimed "Global Cooling" in the 1970's. According to their guess, we were supposed to go into an ice age, whereby killing off our food supply within twenty years. Funny thing is, we still have food, warm climate in zones and cool climate in their zones. Nothing changed, but does anyone remember these charlatans of yesteryear? Apparently not. Because the same story is being told again and again, and this time by a former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore (I invented the Internet). The difference is, we have had thirty years to dumb down our citizens through our socialist agenda schools. Our dope smoking draft dodgers of the sixties, who became teachers to keep from going into the service, are in charge of teaching our children morals, logic's and the three "R"s. Boy are we in trouble. They were in love with Marxism back then and have been indoctrinating our children since then.
Well, now that the entire world has lost their brains and have bought into the concept that man has caused all our global weather, it's time for man to fix it. But wait, how do you fix Mother Nature? If you listen to Al Gore and the left wing loonies, it's to offset your carbon footprint by investing in Al Gore's company. Why do I say it's Al Gore's company? Because he has the majority of stock and will ultimately receive a sizable amount of money if he can get his way, by creating a new "Law" which will force you and me to finance him and make him a super billionaire.
How is he going to manage that you may ask, but spend time looking to me, just look at the Climate Security Act introduced by Liberman-Warner (S.2191) which will cap emissions of carbon dioxide and gasses suspected of attributing to global warming. More than 80% of emissions reduction would have to come from the energy section and to reduce our emission by this amount by 2020 will be devastating to our economy and the way we live. According to the Milwaukee Business Journal, these demands will ultimately increase the cost of energy, especially in natural gas prices.
According to Libermann and Warner, along with the usual brain numb circle of idiots, believe these costs will only amount to about twenty five cents per person. But according to John Engler, president and CEO of National Association of Manufacturers, it "runs the risk of doing more economic harm than environmental good,". Others have suggested that the actual amount this bill will cost America, will be in the billions of dollars. The only way to avoid this catastrophic collision between reality and government is to utilize technology that does not exist yet.
The bill would allow companies who do not use their carbon credits (notice the term "carbon credits"?) and could sell them to other companies who's carbon footprint is too large. This cap and trade system would cause major investments in energy technologies, which as of now seems to be dominated by who else but Al Gore. In effect, this legal move would create the next generation of oil Barron's in this country. This bill had to be written with the help of Al Gore because so much of it's wording is duplicated in this advertisement for his movie.
Now the big question , is Al Gore guilty of creating fraud against the American people with the help of his cronies in Washington and Hollywood? Too many scientist disagree with Al Gore and company. Too much evidence exists that suggest this is a natural occurrence and he is aware of it. Yet, Al Gore and the left loonies will not allow an open debate between their so called scientist and those that insist that this is a natural occurrence of our world. If Al Gore is profiting from deliberately misleading the public, and gaining government assistance, is he guilty? If this bill passes, your pocket book will convict him, but then it will be too late.
Well, now that the entire world has lost their brains and have bought into the concept that man has caused all our global weather, it's time for man to fix it. But wait, how do you fix Mother Nature? If you listen to Al Gore and the left wing loonies, it's to offset your carbon footprint by investing in Al Gore's company. Why do I say it's Al Gore's company? Because he has the majority of stock and will ultimately receive a sizable amount of money if he can get his way, by creating a new "Law" which will force you and me to finance him and make him a super billionaire.
How is he going to manage that you may ask, but spend time looking to me, just look at the Climate Security Act introduced by Liberman-Warner (S.2191) which will cap emissions of carbon dioxide and gasses suspected of attributing to global warming. More than 80% of emissions reduction would have to come from the energy section and to reduce our emission by this amount by 2020 will be devastating to our economy and the way we live. According to the Milwaukee Business Journal, these demands will ultimately increase the cost of energy, especially in natural gas prices.
According to Libermann and Warner, along with the usual brain numb circle of idiots, believe these costs will only amount to about twenty five cents per person. But according to John Engler, president and CEO of National Association of Manufacturers, it "runs the risk of doing more economic harm than environmental good,". Others have suggested that the actual amount this bill will cost America, will be in the billions of dollars. The only way to avoid this catastrophic collision between reality and government is to utilize technology that does not exist yet.
The bill would allow companies who do not use their carbon credits (notice the term "carbon credits"?) and could sell them to other companies who's carbon footprint is too large. This cap and trade system would cause major investments in energy technologies, which as of now seems to be dominated by who else but Al Gore. In effect, this legal move would create the next generation of oil Barron's in this country. This bill had to be written with the help of Al Gore because so much of it's wording is duplicated in this advertisement for his movie.
Now the big question , is Al Gore guilty of creating fraud against the American people with the help of his cronies in Washington and Hollywood? Too many scientist disagree with Al Gore and company. Too much evidence exists that suggest this is a natural occurrence and he is aware of it. Yet, Al Gore and the left loonies will not allow an open debate between their so called scientist and those that insist that this is a natural occurrence of our world. If Al Gore is profiting from deliberately misleading the public, and gaining government assistance, is he guilty? If this bill passes, your pocket book will convict him, but then it will be too late.
Obama requirs America to Ask Permission
Senator and Presidential candidate Obama has decided to relinquish much of Americas destiny to that of the United Nations and the world as a whole. Yesterday while speaking in Oregon, he admonished Americans for using too much food, too much fuel and too much energy. Although these commodities are generated here in America, Senator Obama feels that the world body has a right to say how much we use. It appears the Senator Obama is more of a Marxist than even Hillary Clinton. He appears to be throwing us under the international bus and destroying the America we were born in or moved to.
How dare Senator Obama or the world community to judge our consumption. The United States is a sovereign nation which feeds most of the world, yet we are accused of using more than our "fair" share of our commodities? When a disaster occurs overseas, who is the first country to respond? Who sends the most goods and manpower? It's sure not China, Russia or Sudan. It's the United States of America. What does Senator Obama want from this country for us to take care of the entire world, to support them for the rest of their lives, so they may have luxuries equivalent to those found in America?
This new world order that Senator Obama wants to create is far more exaggerated than even President Clinton's concept of a new wold order. All this hype about world approval is an attempt to destroy our Constitution and fall under the banner of a one nation concept, a United Nations concept. Many of the super liberal aspects of our civilisation has fought for that take over for years, and now they appear to have a strong candidate and mouthpiece for the eventual slight of hand maneuver to create that one world government. Over two hundred years of trying to perfect this Republic and a socialist is set to destroy our great country.
Ask permission from the world bodies on what we can and cannot consume? Are you kidding me? If Senator Obama wants everything equal across the board, why isn't he attacking the civil rights abuses of most the countries in this world. Why isn't he concerned with all the military governments and the socialist governments waiting to pounce upon America? God forbid. The only thing he can concern himself with is our necessity to as the worlds permission. Maybe he should run for the president of the UN and leave America to the Americans to run.
How dare Senator Obama or the world community to judge our consumption. The United States is a sovereign nation which feeds most of the world, yet we are accused of using more than our "fair" share of our commodities? When a disaster occurs overseas, who is the first country to respond? Who sends the most goods and manpower? It's sure not China, Russia or Sudan. It's the United States of America. What does Senator Obama want from this country for us to take care of the entire world, to support them for the rest of their lives, so they may have luxuries equivalent to those found in America?
This new world order that Senator Obama wants to create is far more exaggerated than even President Clinton's concept of a new wold order. All this hype about world approval is an attempt to destroy our Constitution and fall under the banner of a one nation concept, a United Nations concept. Many of the super liberal aspects of our civilisation has fought for that take over for years, and now they appear to have a strong candidate and mouthpiece for the eventual slight of hand maneuver to create that one world government. Over two hundred years of trying to perfect this Republic and a socialist is set to destroy our great country.
Ask permission from the world bodies on what we can and cannot consume? Are you kidding me? If Senator Obama wants everything equal across the board, why isn't he attacking the civil rights abuses of most the countries in this world. Why isn't he concerned with all the military governments and the socialist governments waiting to pounce upon America? God forbid. The only thing he can concern himself with is our necessity to as the worlds permission. Maybe he should run for the president of the UN and leave America to the Americans to run.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
